12/30/2023 0 Comments Beat chess in 4 movesSo, Rykba wont ever even move the knight in a position from which it be chased away in the first place (unless there is good reason to do so).Īnd if you actually read the title, it said how to beat the computer on, not Rybka Why would you assume that Rybka is programmed against my advice specifically just because it plays very good chess?īecause chess engines always search for the best move and the best move in any given position is compeltly determined by the best reply (see: 'game theory') The remainder of your post completly fails to demonstrate such knowledge. You said "strong computer".Rybka would fit my definition of "strong computer"īy the way, I'm very knowledgeable on Rybka. by demonstrating how bogus your ideas are i'm "helping" everyone who reads this thread.Īlso, why would you suddenly compare Rybka to my advice? If someone expresses a statement or idea on a chess forum, they should expect to be challenged. You can just leave this forum if you're going to criticize my advice. I hoped you learned some new information :) By the way, I'm not arguing, just giving information, so you can leave this forum without feeling like arguing. You may not know this, but I've had stronger wins on stronger computers before, using this technique. Human is winning, if its positive, it means Such as isolated pawns, and some programs such as Rybka can even evaluate key positions, but the protection of the chase advice would be difficult due to the probability of interference with its own evaluation function, and in absence of the objective score for this rule.) Branches cut off if violates evaluation function Predicts exponential growth of possibilities If you want to really know something about Rybka, and all chess computers, here you go: Why would you assume that Rybka is programmed against my advice specifically just because it plays very good chess? And if you actually read the title, it said how to beat the computer on, not Rybka, and by the way, who knows if this technique was challenged to Rybka? I'm just giving the chess community some advice to play against the Computer-3-Hard. Also, why would you suddenly compare Rybka to my advice? Of course Rybka wouldn't make that move, it has extreme depths in its searches, and sometimes key positioning, by the way, I'm very knowledgeable on Rybka. if you continue to play chess like that, then that computer will always be rated 400pts higher than you. If by "strong engine" you mean something under 1800 then you may have a point.But even then, this 'advice' would only ever be true if such an >=1800 had no access to a decent opening database.)Īs for the game you post, both sides played a terrible game of chess: white completly fails to correctly use its central advantage, and black embarks on some rubbish wingplay. This advice is rubbish: I'm no programmer but i'm sure it is easy to program, which is why we dont see Rybka playing such crap (that said, it just occured to me that by "strong" chess engine you might not have been refering to the likes of mighty rykba. That's how many chess players can sneak in perpetual checks, and amazing comeback wins against strong computers. "Computers Don't expect you to keep chasing their army around the board, in their searches, that logic isn't easy to program. ![]() ![]() Principle: Chase the enemy pieces around the board! You probably won't encounter the same position, but you can try to use this game to help your (against computer play). ![]() That's the trick, this computer was rated 400 more than me, but I just calmly symmetrically moved, let the other army charge, and then chase the knight away until it forced white to lose a minor piece. Here's how, watch the game: Computers Don't expect you to keep chasing their army around the board, in their searches, that logic isn't easy to program. ![]() Here's the game, but be aware that the computer may not always do the same thing if you always make the same moves. Note: I was playing the black pieces, so you should flip the board. I did not end up winning the game, but I got a huge lead, and if I was a little better about not making blunders on, I could have won. Hello everyone, even as a non-serious player, I can get a pretty easy win against the Computer-3-Hard chess computer on, (These computer series are on live chess).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |